Senate rejects mandatory electronic transmission; Akpabio says results upload still allowed
The controversy followed the Senate’s clause-by-clause consideration of the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill, during which lawmakers voted down an amendment to Clause 60(3) that sought to mandate presiding officers to electronically transmit polling unit results to INEC’s Result Viewing (IReV) portal in real time after signing and stamping Form EC8A.
Instead, the chamber retained the current wording in the Electoral Act, which provides that “the presiding officer shall transfer the results, including the total number of accredited voters and the results of the ballot, in a manner as prescribed by the Commission.”
By rejecting the amendment, the Senate declined to hard-wire mandatory electronic transmission into the statute, leaving the mode of results transfer to INEC’s operational guidelines rather than making it an absolute legal requirement.
However, Senate President Godswill Akpabio moved quickly to counter public claims that lawmakers had rejected electronic transmission entirely.
“Distinguished colleagues, the social media is already awash with reports that the Senate has rejected electronic transmission of results. That is not true,” Akpabio said after the bill was passed following a marathon session lasting over four hours.
“What we did was to retain the electronic transmission which has been in the Act and was used in 2022. So please do not allow people to confuse you.”
He stressed that the Senate merely refused to impose a new mandatory layer, not to abolish digital uploads.
“This Senate under my watch has not rejected the electronic transmission of results. We have retained what was in the previous provision by way of amendment. The previous provision already made allowance for electronic transmission, so it is still part of our law. We cannot afford to be going backwards,” Akpabio said.
Under the Electoral Act 2022, electronic transmission is not expressly compulsory. Section 60 provides that results shall be transferred “in a manner as prescribed by the Commission,” giving INEC the power to determine whether, when and how technology such as BVAS and the IReV portal is used.
This was the legal basis upon which INEC uploaded polling unit results electronically during the 2023 general elections, even though the law itself did not impose a strict obligation for real-time transmission.
The rejected Senate amendment sought to change that framework by compelling presiding officers to upload results immediately and electronically, a move civil society groups and opposition parties argue would strengthen transparency and reduce manipulation.
But lawmakers maintained that embedding a rigid technical process in the law could limit INEC’s flexibility, especially in areas with connectivity challenges.
Akpabio urged Nigerians to distinguish between rejecting electronic transmission and rejecting mandatory electronic transmission.
“If you are in doubt, we will make our final votes and proceedings available to you. Please don’t go with the crowd,” he added.
The debate highlights a central tension in Nigeria’s electoral reforms: whether technology should remain a tool controlled by INEC or become a strict statutory obligation.
As the National Assembly continues work on the Electoral Act amendments ahead of future elections, the fate of mandatory electronic transmission remains one of the most politically sensitive and closely watched reforms in the country’s democratic process.
